How Often Should You Pen Test?

How Often Should You Pen Test

We've been helping companies assess and upgrade their penetration testing capabilities for over a decade.

Based on that experience, we want to share our thoughts on why it's better to do more frequent pen testing than you likely do at present.

TL;DR: Generally, penetration testing benefits (resilience, cost, and compliance) improve as your penetration testing program becomes more mature and frequent.

In the rest of this article, we will dive into exactly why pen testing more often is better than less often, plus what penetration testing maturity actually means for your organisation.


How to Assess Your Penetration Testing Maturity At a Glance

Use the following table to quickly identify where your current approach to penetration testing stands and what steps you should take to level up.

Diagram_What to do Before


Companies Tend to Fall Into 2 Broad Categories of Pen Testing Maturity

There are many reasons why one company might be more mature and another less so when it comes to penetration testing.

Budget is a core reason why some companies are more mature than others. But different levels of penetration testing maturity can also come as a result of:

Here’s how to understand your level of penetration testing maturity and what that means for your cybersecurity posture.


Less mature companies test reactively

You could describe this kind of company’s approach to testing as "response-driven.”

For response-driven organisations, pen testing happens as a means to an end or a way to tick a box.

We’ve seen two subcategories of reactive companies, one slightly more mature than the other:

Occasional and ad hoc (lowest penetration testing maturity level)

This is the least mature approach to pen testing.

Testing only occurs because someone (usually a client) requests a penetration test report, or there is a specific (externally driven) reason.

Many smaller companies are at this level of penetration testing maturity.

These are companies that may need to provide a client with a penetration test report for procurement purposes, and that test will likely be a one-off exercise. The next time they conduct a penetration test will be when they receive another request or when the previous one is considered “expired” by the requester.

Or, testing might not happen at all, leaving the company highly exposed to potential unknown risks. We have also seen some companies at this level confuse pen testing with vulnerability scanning.

Companies with ad hoc testing programs usually:

More frequent but unstructured (slightly more mature penetration testing)

These are companies that conduct penetration tests more regularly but still treat penetration testing as something to be done in response to a specific event, such as making major internal or external IT changes or updating a product/application.

Other triggers for organisations at this level of penetration testing maturity to pen test might include:

Penetration testing for these kinds of organisations tends to be unstructured in terms of when it occurs and may not integrate into a broader security program.

Security and IT teams here tend to be wary of pen testing as they know that unexpected results can catch them off guard. Consequently, they may try to steer testing toward expected results. For example, they might use the same vendor year on year with the "expectation" that results will always be similar.

More mature companies ensure they are receiving best-in-class service through a process of regular capability reassessment.

Some organisations periodically conduct structured exercises or mock assessments to compare vendors’ capabilities and ensure they continue to meet expectations.

This approach helps maintain strong coverage and high-quality outcomes without unnecessarily disrupting long-term relationships or incurring additional procurement overhead.


High penetration testing maturity companies test proactively

At the higher levels of penetration testing maturity, organisations have a structured program.

Penetration tests occur as part of a security improvement program; everyone is aware of what to expect, and a plan is in place to address the results.

A company with a mature pen testing program has some or all of these three features:

The primary difference between a mature and immature program is that penetration testing will occur because a company wants to invest in building its resilience. (Note: Mature organisations will still do pen testing due to “push factors,” e.g., compliance or major changes to applications or their environment).

Testing to build resilience means:

a) Testing critical systems at frequent intervals.

b) Testing less obviously at-risk parts of the environment, i.e., parts of their systems that might seem unlikely to be accidentally exposed online, but would still lead to significant disruption if they were hacked.

In a mature organisation, the testing timeline is typically managed through a structured penetration testing programme, which involves maintaining a clear asset inventory and defining a testing frequency for each asset.

Organisations with a mature programme also assess not only external threats (“outside-in”) but risks originating within the perimeter, such as potential internal attackers or disgruntled employees.

There is a penetration testing governance structure that is regularly reviewed and updated to ensure its effectiveness and relevance.

The benefit of a governance structure is that a company gains the ability to properly define the scope of penetration testing. A structured approach to planning what should be tested, how, and when saves time and money.

This means the company knows how to apply the right security test for the right purpose. It conducts frequent vulnerability assessments to maintain broad security hygiene and complements them with targeted penetration tests at a frequency determined by the criticality of the asset, its exposure, and other relevant factors.

At higher levels of maturity, companies tend to integrate security into their core business operations.

This can involve considering security early in the development process for any application, including defining security requirements, performing threat modelling, and conducting architecture reviews, in addition to penetration testing.

It can also involve testing infrastructure early in a build or change so that security can be built in rather than “bolted on” to whatever service or system is launched.


What Penetration Testing Maturity “Feels Like”

The more mature a penetration testing program is, the easier, more effective, and more impactful testing (and the cybersecurity program as a whole) becomes.

A company with a mature pen testing program can unlock incredible security benefits compared to its peers. Benefits that security teams, CISOs, and non-technical managers will feel on a day-to-day basis.

These benefits include:

Cost Savings and Other Financial Benefits

Improved Security Effectiveness

Reputation and Compliance

For CISOs, a mature testing program can unlock paths towards reducing cybersecurity risk.

For example, an experienced CISO in a company with high testing maturity will be able to read a penetration test report for various parts of their environment and identify the root causes of recurring risks.

They get to see exactly where they might need additional control zones. This can result in lightbulb moments, such as “Oh, what’s our backup segregation or partition strategy?”


Level Up Your Penetration Testing Maturity

SECFORCE pen testing experts have helped hundreds of organisations assess and improve their penetration testing maturity.

Contact us for a free consultation today to explore how you can develop a more mature security and testing program within your company or learn more about our penetration maturity assessment services.

You may also be interested in...

CBEST Implementation Guide 2024 Update
March 20, 2024

CBEST Implementation Guide: What’s New In 2024

A refresher on the overall CBEST process and a quick summary of the updates for 2024.

See more
Visual Cybersecurity Consulting - The Secret Weapon for a Great Pen Test
Nov. 27, 2024

Cybersecurity Consulting - The Secret Weapon for a Great Pen Test?

An overview on why our team recommends adding a consulting phase right before testing a critical application within your organisation.

See more